Friday, 25 December 2015

3 Important Skills We Need in Life

The 3 most important skills you need to be successful in life

By Mark Ford  |  Dec 18, 2015

Today, I'd like to talk about the most important skills we need to be successful in life.

I've been thinking about this subject for several decades. I hope what I'm about to say will be helpful to you.

I've identified about a dozen skills I believe are important to a successful life. Of these, three are fundamental: thinking well, speaking well, and writing well.

At some level, every human being can think.

But some people, I'm sure you would agree, think better than others.

Thinking well

Thinking well means having the capacity to reason. It means being able to assess, analyze, and solve problems. It means being able to create and follow a trend of thought.

It means being able to distinguish good ideas from bad ones. It means understanding logic.

Having the ability to think well gives a person a great competitive advantage. It allows him to solve problems and accomplish objectives quickly and efficiently. It distinguishes him as a smart and capable person.

Thinking well is the basis for both of the other important social skills, as you'll soon see.

In thinking about thinking, we must remember there's a difference between thinking well and intelligence. Thinking well is a skill. Intelligence is a natural capacity.

Having sizable intellect is an indisputable asset. It makes learning how to think well much easier... but it doesn't guarantee it. The world is full of intelligent people who've never learned how to think well. They grow up to be adults who don't have the intellectual capacity to fend for themselves. They live out their lives dependent on the kindness of others.

Thinking well, like any other skill, can be learned.

If it can be learned, it can be taught.

And teaching it to your children will fall primarily on your shoulders. Government-run schools – and many private schools – have neither the interest nor the ability to do this. The job is, and should be, up to you.

There are at least three ways you can teach your children to think well.

The most important way is probably through thoughtful conversation. Taking the time to walk your children through problems and obstacles is invaluable. Asking them questions and challenging their answers is also important.

And finally, it's important to encourage them to have their own ideas. Society wants to make us all think alike. You can't possibly be a good thinker unless you have the temerity to think for yourself.

The second most important way is probably through a good formal education. A good formal education, in my view, is one that emphasizes the liberal arts: literature, language, history, and the arts.

Some knowledge of science and mathematics are helpful. But these skills aren't likely to make you anything more than a successful or celebrated worker bee. The skills you learn in liberal arts teach you how to think.

The third way you can teach your children to think well is by exacting a diligent control over their use of computers, video games, television, and the Internet. My wife and I unplugged our televisions during the 25 years our children lived at home. And we banned video games and encouraged our children to play games that were educational.

Today, there are hundreds of games you can download free or for a few dollars from the Internet. These include fundamental thinking games about discrimination, recognition, sorting, pairing, etc., and more advanced games that focus on skills such as analysis and logic.

Speaking well

I'm proud to say our children are reasonably proficient speakers. In my view, speaking well is the second most important social skill.

As with thinking well, we need to make a distinction here. Speaking well involves grammar and diction. But these aren't as important as the ability to express worthy thoughts concisely and clearly.

However good your grammar and diction may be, you can't speak well if you have trouble saying what you mean. To become a good speaker, you must practice the skill of speaking concisely. You must also develop the habit of saying things worth saying.

It's amazing how many college-educated people I meet who can't speak well. They're the people who have good ideas but can't express them. When trying to express even a modestly complicated thought, they hem and haw and pepper their phrases with expressions like "you know," "it was like," and so on. Then, there are the articulate people who never say anything that's not shallow or trivial.

Having the ability to speak well is such a rare quality, possessing it immediately separates you from most other people in the room. It'll give you the social power they lack... even if they're richer, taller, and better looking than you are.

How do you teach your children to speak well?

Again, the most important way is by speaking well yourself. A child's first and most frequent exposure to the skill of speaking is with his parents. Small children absorb the intricacies of language like sponges. If you want your children to have this second most valuable social skill, speak thoughtfully when you speak to them. And expect them to do the same with you.

Next, you can encourage your children to speak well by insisting they take courses that involve speaking in school. These are primarily liberal-arts courses, but also any courses for which you can't get a grade simply by checking off boxes.

There's also the Internet. There are dozens and dozens of applications available that'll improve one's vocabulary and grammar. These aren't the most important elements of speaking well, but they help.

Writing well

The third most important social skill is writing well.

It may seem that writing has become less important in the age of instant messaging, but writing short communications is still writing.

And as your child enters the workforce, writing well will become an increasingly valuable skill. Having the ability to express himself or herself well in memos, business letters, proposals, personal notes, and so on is a very powerful skill.

Writing well is dependent on speaking well, and speaking well is dependent on thinking well. So, if you educate your children to think and speak well, it will be quite easy to teach them to become good writers.

Again, writing well is the skill of expressing worthy ideas concisely and clearly on paper. Writing well demands some additional facilities beyond those of speaking well. But for the most part, if you can speak well, you can write well.

The most important way you can teach your children to write well is to insist they spend some amount of time writing every day. You might encourage your children to write letters to an out-of-town relative or find a pen pal through one of the supervised pen-pal sites on the Internet.

Thinking, speaking, and writing well are the three most important social skills. If your children learn these, they'll be set for life.

They'll have the abilities to analyze problems and find solutions for them, and thus be seen as problem solvers. They'll be able to stand out in any social group (at work or outside of work), thanks to their ability to express good ideas concisely and clearly.

Plus, if they acquire good manners, they won't have to pay the cost of treating other people badly.

  

4 Surprising Skills All Successful People Require

By Keven Daum  |  Aug 25, 2014
There are all sorts of skills that can contribute to success. But these 4 are critical. Without them, you'll never make it.

Want to be successful? You have to start with you. So much is written about generosity and empathy being important skills for success, and they are. But these outward-facing skills only come with the complete knowledge and control of oneself.
Your mother probably told you to think of others first and often, that the world was not about you. And yet even those who are the most generous and empathetic had to focus strongly inward to create the wealth and connections that allow them to positively influence the world. Sure, the traits below are very self-focused, but you can't possibly benefit other people without getting your own house in order.
1. Self-Awareness
Do you truly understand who you are? Are you aware of how you make people feel and react by the things you say and do and even more the ways you say and do them? Many people don't have a good sense of their outer being. They go through their day reacting and doing while not even realizing what comes out of their mouths or how their actions affect the people around them. Commit time to getting to know yourself, especially from the outside. Invite others to share their observations of your behavior and attitudes. Don't just focus on your positive attributes.
Go to those you know will be honest and spend time learning about your potentially challenging attributes as well. The more you understand about how you affect people the better you can motivate them to join you in a worthy cause. Then you can decide whether to keep, adjust, or eliminate behaviors in order to reach your preferred future.
2. Self-Confidence
If you don't believe in yourself, why would anyone else? When you're a successful leader, people want to believe you know where to go and have some idea of how to get there. They are dealing with their own insecurities and don't really have additional tolerance for yours if you are in charge. That may be unfair, but reality is not generally a function of fairness. Being self-confident does not mean you have to know all the answers. But it does mean you must have the inner strength and knowledge to address any given situation or obstacle that may come your way. Experience helps, but it is a combination of resourcefulness, resolve, and humility that will make most people, even you, believe in your leadership.
Take stock of what you do well. Identify your areas of insecurity and create a plan to remedy those areas through education and support, remembering that the only one who can truly make you confident is you.
3. Self-Assessment
Life moves fast and opportunities can go as quickly as they present themselves. You don't always have time to consult with others as to whether or not your current capabilities are up to the challenges headed your way. Still you need to gauge if you are on the right path or change is immediately required. Self-encouragement is great but if you can't be realistic about your levels and limitations, you'll crash and burn far more than you'll succeed. No one should know you better than you.
Create self-diagnostics that expose your weaknesses and perform so you can shore up your weaknesses with learning, partnership, or delegation. The joy of informed success far outweighs the tragedy of ignorant failure.
4. Self-Discipline
Any success worth having doesn't come easy. It requires focus and determination. Growth occurs from careful analysis and practiced performance. Inconsistent attempts to succeed will fail more often than not. If you could just take a shot and make it happen, more people would be successful. But it's the people who get more things right who ultimately win. Self-discipline keeps you on the straight and narrow, avoiding distractions or taking the easy way out of challenges.

Even if you are not ordinarily a planner, write down bullet points or steps to your success. Use the skills above to figure out the work you need to do to get there. Then measure your progress regularly so you can tell where you are being your own greatest supporter or worst enemy. Once you know, the rest is up to you.


5 Key Skills for Academic Success

The 4 Habits You Need to Be Successful

The Most Important Skills You Didn't Learn In School


Tuesday, 24 November 2015

山中雜記: 為何只悲法國,不悲黎巴嫩?

山中雜記∶為何只悲法國,不悲黎巴嫩?答案很簡單,因爲無知。

引申阅读伊斯蘭國專題

遜尼派聖戰組織伊斯蘭國(ISIS)在敘利亞和伊拉克異軍突起,為國際社會投下了一枚震撼彈,並以驚人的速度擴張版圖時,西方各國才如夢初醒。它迫使西方世界重新省思911以降的中東政策,更加改變了西方政府對國家安全與恐怖主義的理解──ISIS早已不止是中東地區的「區域問題」。

》導讀:這一切的動盪就從中東筆直的國界線談起…

IS:他們到底要什麼?從地圖一次看懂IS的崛起與終極目標

看不見的恐怖攻擊 ~「歷史文盲」的攻擊
   說別人「恐怖主義」以前,請先翻閱自己偉大文明的血腥歷史

趙恩潔老師探討一個醜陋的國際政治現實:到底以色列,還是伊拉克境內的ISIS,誰才是恐怖組織?她寫了這麼長一篇文章,想提醒大家:說別人「恐怖主義」以前,請先翻閱自己偉大文明的血腥歷史。(本文從人類發展、歷史的角度出發,立基於學術文獻,解構了主流媒體如何用話術、標籤形塑出對其自身有利的輿論,進而影響大眾的認知。)

IS不只有中東人,還有英國人、法國人 一分鐘看懂歐洲青年,為何加入IS


Tuesday, 6 October 2015

Outspoken Ahmad Mustapha Hassan @ www.theantdaily.com

Ahmad Mustapha Hassan is a former press secretary to second Prime Minister Tun Abdul Razak Hussein and the writer of the book, "The Unmaking of Malaysia".


一些马来人,特别是那些参与所谓红衫军集会的人,对于他们自己的历史以及这个国家为何会演变成一个多元种族、多元文化以及多元宗教所知甚少,这是可悲的。

这些马来人甚至还没有超越他们的理性、情感、不合逻辑的思维方式,还有他们的牧群以及攻城心态。

大多数人甚至不知道为什么自己会出现在那场蛊惑人心的集会中。

一些人参加集会是因为他们获得免费交通、食物以及金钱。有些人则视这为在吉隆坡购物的机会。

但总体而言,他们对于国家的历史是所知甚少的。

在英国人来到之前,马来西亚半岛充斥着各位酋长之间的冲突。

他们并没有任何创造国家的想法。

每一名酋长都会视那些接受他作为权力最终来源的人,就是他的臣民并属于他的管辖的。

当时收入的来源主要是来自盗版以及鸦片税务。 

他们并没有欲望或是远见要将收入的领域扩展至其他来源。

当时只有柔佛展示了发展国家的渴望,它们也开放了土地作为胡椒以及甘比尔(gambier, 甘蜜)的种植。


柔佛当时的统治者邀请了来自新加坡的华裔来到柔佛种植有关植物,而这些华裔在新加坡是参与农作物培育的。

他们因为有关目的而获得授予土地,并得到有关土地的特殊权利。

在历史中,那时的柔佛就成为了胡椒以及甘比尔最大的出口商,而这也为该州增加了不少财富。

然而,财富的另一来源是锡米。

马来矿工被要求以固定价格出售锡米给他们的酋长,然后酋长再将锡米卖给华裔商人。

但是,这个行业在酋长之间引发竞争,并造成损害。

1829年,华裔移民踏足此行业,有些华裔甚至为马来酋长打工,但是由于马来酋长之间出现竞争,导致华裔渐渐成为这个行业的主导。

这个行业为霹雳以及雪兰莪创建了不少财富。

因此,这表明国家的财富,纯粹是华裔透过辛勤劳动,而为国家创造财富的。

马来酋长们也纷纷加入这个行业,并试图抢得先机,因此他们也在彼此之间产生了敌意。

贪婪使他们失去了这个行业,并拱手相让给其他人。

即便国家充满自然财富,但是马来人成为穷人并非华裔的过错。

这是因为他们酋长之间的不稳定局势导致他们将整盘生意输给华裔的。

英国殖民通过给酋长们固定的津贴,从而在他们之间达致和平。

英国也帮助那些在半岛的人确定谁才是正确的索赔者,那些对英国有功的人,就会扶摇直上被跃升为苏丹的地位,并得到维多利亚女王的祝福。

他们都必须宣誓效中于英国君主。也就是,这就是发生在马来西亚半岛的。

随着马来西亚在1963年出世,全国的政治人口也起了变化。

巫裔至上已经变得不恰当而且是过时的,我国已经成为一个多元种族、多元文化以及多元宗教的国家。

English Version

It is very sad that some Malays, especially those who took part in the so called red shirt rally, know very little of their history and why this country evolved into being a multi-ethnic, multicultural and multi-religious country.

These Malays have yet to transcend their irrational, emotional, and illogical mindsets as well as their herd and siege mentalities.

Most were not even aware as to why they were there in the rabble-rousing rally.

Some came because they were given free transportation, food and money. Some considered this an opportunity to do some shopping in Kuala Lumpur.

But on the whole they had very little knowledge of the history of the country.

The peninsula before the arrival of the British was full of conflicts among the various chiefs in the country.

They did not have any sense of creating a state where boundaries and areas were clearly marked.

Each chieftain would consider those who accepted him as the ultimate source of power as being his subjects and belonging to his state.


The sources of revenue were mostly from piracy and tax on opium.

There was no desire or vision to extend this area of revenue to other sources.

Only Johor at that time showed some eagerness to develop the country by opening up land for pepper and gambier plantations.

The ruler of Johor at that time invited the Chinese from Singapore who were involved in cultivating these crops in Singapore to come over to Johor to plant them.

Land was given to them for that purpose and special rights to the land were also given to them.

Johor became the biggest exporter of pepper and gambier during that period of national history and this added to the wealth of the state.

Yet another source of wealth was tin.

The Malay miners were required to sell the tin to their chiefs at fixed prices and the chiefs then sold the tin to Chinese merchants.

But there arose the rivalry among the chiefs to the detriment of the industry.

In the 1820s Chinese immigrants were involved in the industry with some working for the Malay chiefs but due to the rivalry among the Malay chiefs, the Chinese became the dominant group involved in this industry.

The industry created wealth for Perak and Selangor.

It therefore showed much evidence that wealth in the country was created by the Chinese through sheer hard work.

The Malay chiefs were much too involved in trying to grab opportunities, thus creating animosity among themselves to their own detriment.

Greed made them lose the industry to others.

It was never the fault of the Chinese that the Malays became poor although the country was full of natural wealth.

It was the unstable situation among their own chiefs that caused them to lose out to the Chinese.

British colonialism managed to bring peace among all the chiefs by giving all of them fixed allowances.
The British too were instrumental in determining who the right claimants were to the various states in the peninsula and those helpful to the British were elevated to the status of Sultans with the blessing of Queen Victoria.

All of them had to pledge loyalty to the British monarch. That, in short, was what happened in the peninsula.

And with the creation of Malaysia in 1963, the whole political demography changed.

The “ketuanan Melayu” had become irrelevant and out of date as the country had become multi-ethnic, multicultural and multi-religious.  

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Read More By Ahmad Mustapha Hassan @ www.theantdaily.com:-



It is quite normal for anyone to ask this question: Where are we going and where are you taking us? Since you took over the reins of government, we seem to be moving neither here nor there. Most people are baffled because you seem to enjoy life while the country is facing innumerable critical problems.

Even as these problems are left unattended, more problems are being added. Your words have no meaning whatsoever as your cabinet ministers have been acting to dismantle what you had promised the people before you were given the mandate to run the country.

Your father was so different. Tun Abdul Razak’s words were meant as instructions to all, ministers, civil servants and the people. No member of his cabinet would go against what he desired for the people. All worked towards achieving that aim.

He was very prudent and would not spend people’s money unnecessarily. He limited his overseas travel to no more than twice a year. He would cut out all non-essential expenses. He did not believe in creating unwanted and expensive icons.

He was interested in uplifting the economic situation of the whole nation, not just creating a few wealthy and self-centred individuals. He believed that he should not waste the rakyat’s money by bringing those who did not matter on his overseas trips.

That was how astute and concerned Tun Razak was about the welfare of the people and the country.

You appear to be away from the country most of the time and it had been reported that so far your travels had cost the country RM44 million. That is a very huge amount even for a prime minister.

Your father depended on advice from local experts, and he placed trusted people in positions, in the knowledge that their contribution would see to the success of projects. He started Mara to take over the role carried out by Rida (Rural and Industrial Development Authority) before and placed capable officers to man the various divisions in Mara. He had the late Mansor Osman (later MB of Negeri Sembilan) placed in the division to offer scholarships and aid to needy rural students.

He trusted Tan Sri Arshad Ayub to steer the Mara College towards developing more Bumiputera professionals. He placed people where he knew they would be able to assist his goal in uplifting the professional capabilities of those who had been neglected before.

He placed an able and dedicated civil servant Tan Sri Thong Yaw Hong in a position to assist him realise the objectives of his rural development programme.

He recognised and trusted those civil servants whom he knew personally and appointed them to positions of trust, like Tan Sri Ramon Navaratnam , Tan Sri Tunku Shahriman, Dr Agoes Salim, Raja Alias and Tan Sri Rama Iyer in planning and development units in the Prime Minister's Department.

To him, all were Malaysians and he overrode any racial or religious sentimentality. He was a man of the people of all shades and religious beliefs.

He had only one goal in mind and that was the welfare of the people and to him it would take all Malaysians to achieve this. He was also not distracted by petty and hollow sloganeering.

None would dare to approach him and shout “Ketuanan Melayu” or any such nonsense. The government would help all the people towards achieving a better life.

Government involvement in religion, to him, should also be at a minimum scale. Religion was a faith adhered to by individuals and that should be about all there was to it.

He did not encourage the religious department to expand its jurisdiction whereby it could pose a threat to national harmony.

But unfortunately, at present, things seem to have gone out of hand. Ministers contradict what the prime minister had promised. Voices of disharmony were allowed free reign. Acts that harm the sensitivities of those not of the Muslim faith are on the rise.

And yet you champion 1Malaysia. It was there all along but subsequent leaders, especially those from Umno Baru, had dismantled that by allowing anti-national elements from the cabinet itself to “flourish” uncontrollably.

You told the Sabah and Sarawak people of the freedom in practising their religion and then a ban was imposed on their newsletter. Sarawak and Sabah together with Malaya then had formed Malaysia, and there was no need to tell them that they are part of Malaysia. They definitely were and are part and parcel of Malaysia.

One very important factor was that Tun Razak walked the talk.

The Malay paper Utusan Melayu with national calibre editors like Yusof Ishak and Said Zahari had been vocal in fighting for the truth and even when it was taken over by Umno, it still remained as a national paper that was very much respected.

But once Umno Baru took over the country, the paper has become the party’s organ and has been allowed to become a national trash. The TV channels have also become the mouthpiece of the party. They have miserably failed to play a positive role in fostering national unity.

Every single effort should be coordinated like during Tun Razak’s time to achieve the national goal of equality, prosperity and happiness for all.

Pray! Tell us! Are you taking us towards disaster!


Wednesday, 23 September 2015

Don't Manage Your Time - Manage Your Life !!!

Don’t Try to Manage Your Time - Manage Yourself

BY THE JOHN MAXWELL COMPANY                                 MAY 26, 2015

Here's an important announcement: There is no such thing as time management.

Think about it; the term is an oxymoron. Time cannot be managed. It cannot be controlled in any way. Everyone gets the same number of hours and minutes every day. Nobody—no matter how shrewd—can save minutes from one day to spend on another. No scientist—no matter how smart—is capable of creating new minutes. Even with all his wealth, someone like Bill Gates can’t buy additional hours for his day. And even though people talk about trying to “find time,” they need to quit looking. There isn’t any extra lying around. Twenty-four hours is the best any of us is going to get. You can’t manage your time. So what can you do?

Manage yourself! Nothing separates successful people from unsuccessful people more than how they use their time. Successful people understand that time is the most precious commodity on earth. And that we all have an equal amount, packed into identical suitcases. So even though everyone's suitcase is the same size, they get a higher return on the contents of theirs. Why? They know what to pack.

Essayist Henry David Thoreau wrote, “It is not enough to be busy. The question is, ‘What are we busy about?’” How do you judge whether something is worthy of your time and attention? For years I used this formula to help me know the importance of a task so that I can manage myself effectively. It’s a three step process:

1. RATE THE TASK IN TERMS OF IMPORTANCE.

        Critical = 5 points
        Necessary = 4 points
        Important = 3 points
        Helpful = 2 points
        Marginal = 1 point

2. DETERMINE THE TASK’S URGENCY.

        This month = 5 points
        Next month = 4 points
        This quarter = 3 points
        Next quarter = 2 points
        End of year = 1 point

3. MULTIPLY THE RATE OF IMPORTANCE TIMES THE RATE OF URGENCY.

        Example: 5 (critical) x 4 (next month) = 20.

After assigning each task a new number, make a new to-do list. This time list everything from highest to lowest task management score. THAT’S how you plan your day. How you spend your time is an important question not only for you but for your team. People tend to take their cues from the leader when it comes to time management—so make sure there’s a match between your actions, your business priorities, and your team’s activities.



Monday, 7 September 2015

Things I Wish Someone Had Told Me

When I Was Learning How to Code
And what I’ve learned from teaching others
By Cecily Carver                 Nov 22, 2013

Before you learn to code, think about what you want to code

Knowing how to code is mostly about building things, and the path is a lot clearer when you have a sense of the end goal. If your goal is “learn to code,” without a clear idea of the kinds of programs you will write and how they will make your life better, you will probably find it a frustrating exercise.

I’m a little ashamed to admit that part of my motivation for studying computer science was that I wanted to prove I was smart, and I wanted to be able to get Smart Person jobs. I also liked thinking about math and theory (this book blew my mind at an impressionable age) and the program was a good fit. It wasn’t enough to sustain me for long, though, until I found ways to connect technology to the things I really loved, like music and literature.

So, what do you want to code? Websites? Games? iPhone apps? A startup that makes you rich? Interactive art? Do you want to be able to impress your boss or automate a tedious task so you can spend more time looking at otter pictures? Perhaps you simply want to be more employable, add a buzzword to your resume, or fulfill the requirements of your educational program. All of these are worthy goals. Make sure you know which one is yours, and study accordingly.

There’s nothing mystical about it

Coding is a skill like any other. Like language learning, there’s grammar and vocabulary to acquire. Like math, there are processes to work through specific types of problems. Like all kinds of craftsmanship and art-making, there are techniques and tools and best practices that people have developed over time, specialized to different tasks, that you’re free to use or modify or discard.

This guy (a very smart guy! Whose other writings I enjoy and frequently agree with!) posits that there is a bright line between people with the True Mind of a Programmer and everyone else, who are lacking the intellectual capacity needed to succeed in the field. That bright line consists, according to him, of pointers and recursion (there are primers here and here for the curious).

I learned about pointers and recursion in school, and when I understood them, it was a delightful jolt to my brain — the kind of intellectual pleasure that made me want to study computer science in the first place. But, outside of classroom exercises, the number of times I’ve had to be familiar with either concept to get things done has been relatively small. And when helping others learn, over and over again, I’ve watched people complete interesting and rewarding projects without knowing anything about either one.

There’s no point in being intimidated or wondering if you’re Smart Enough. Sure, the more complex and esoteric your task, the higher the level of mastery you will need to complete it. But this is true in absolutely every other field. Unless you’re planning to make your living entirely by your code, chances are you don’t have to be a recursion-understanding genius to make the thing you want to make.

It never works the first time
And probably won’t the second or third time

When you first start learning to code, you’ll very quickly run up against this particular experience: you think you’ve set up everything the way you’re supposed to, you’ve checked and re-checked it, and it still. doesn’t. work. You don’t have a clue where to begin trying to fix it, and the error message (if you’re lucky enough to have one at all) might as well say “fuck you.” You might be tempted to give up at this point, thinking that you’ll never figure it out, that you’re not cut out for this. I had that feeling the first time I tried to write a program in C++, ran it, and got only the words “segmentation fault” for my trouble.

But this experience is so common for programmers of all skill levels that it says absolutely nothing about your intelligence, tech-savviness, or suitability for the coding life. It will happen to you as a beginner, but it will also happen to you as an experienced programmer. The main difference will be in how you respond to it.

I’ve found that a big difference between new coders and experienced coders is faith: faith that things are going wrong for a logical and discoverable reason, faith that problems are fixable, faith that there is a way to accomplish the goal. The path from “not working” to “working” might not be obvious, but with patience you can usually find it.

Someone will always tell you you’re doing it wrong
Braces should go on the next line. Braces should go on the same line. Use tabs to indent. But tabs are evil. You should use stored procedures, but actually you shouldn’t use them. You should always comment your code. But good code doesn’t need comments.

There are almost always many different approaches to a particular problem, with no single “right way.” A lot of programmers get very good at advocating for their preferred way, but that doesn’t mean it’s the One True Path. Going head-to-head with people telling me I was Wrong, and trying to figure out if they were right, was one of the more stressful aspects of my early career.

If you’re coding in a team with other people, someone will almost certainly take issue with something that you’re doing. Sometimes they’ll be absolutely correct, and it’s always worth investigating to see whether you are, in fact, Doing It Wrong. But sometimes they will be full of shit, or re-enacting an ancient and meaningless dispute where it would be best to just follow a style guide and forget about it.

On the other hand, if you’re the kind of person who enjoys ancient but meaningless disputes (grammar nerds, I’m looking at you), you’ve come to the right place.

Someone will always tell you you’re not a real coder
HTML isn’t real coding. If you don’t use vi, you’re not really serious. Real programmers know C. Real coders don’t do Windows. Some people will never be able to learn it. You shouldn’t learn to code. You’re not a computer programmer (but I am).

Coding” means a lot of different things to a lot of different people, and it looks different now from how it used to. And, funnily enough, the tools and packages and frameworks that make it faster and easier for newcomers or even trained developers to build things are most likely to be tarred with the “not for REAL coders” brush. (See: “Return of the Real Programmer”)

Behind all this is the fear that if “anyone” can call themselves a programmer, the title will become meaningless. But I think that this gatekeeping is destructive.

Use the tools that make it easiest to build the things you want to build. If that means your game was made in Stencyl or GameMaker rather than written from scratch, that’s fine. If your first foray into coding is HTML or Excel macros, that’s fine. Work with something you feel you can stick with.

As you get more comfortable, you’ll naturally start to find those tools limiting rather than helpful and look for more powerful ones. But most of the time, few people will ever even look at your code or even ask what you used — It’s what you make with it that counts.

Worrying about “geek cred” will slowly kill you

See above. I used to worry a lot, especially in school, about whether I was identifying myself as “not a real geek” (and therefore less worthy of inclusion in tech communities) through my clothing, my presentation, my choice of reading material and even my software customization choices. It was a terrible waste of energy and I became a lot more functional after I made the decision to let it all go.

You need to internalize this: your ability to get good at coding has nothing to do with how well you fit into the various geek subcultures. This goes double if you know deep down that you’ll never quite fit. The energy you spend proving yourself should be going into making things instead. And, if you’re an indisputable geek with cred leaking from your eye sockets, keep this in mind for when you’re evaluating someone else’s cred level. It may not mean what you think it does.

Sticking with it is more important than the method

There’s no shortage of articles about the “right” or “best” way to learn how to code, and there are lots of potential approaches. You can learn the concepts from a book or by completing interactive exercises or by debugging things that others have written. And, of course, there are lots of languages you might choose as your first to learn, with advocates for each.

A common complaint with “teach yourself to code” programs and workshops is that you’ll breeze happily through the beginner material and then hit a steep curve where things get more difficult very quickly. You know how to print some lines of text on a page but have no idea where to start working on a “real,” useful project. You might feel like you were just following directions without really understanding, and blame the learning materials.

When you get to this stage, most of the tutorials and online resources available to you are much less useful because they assume you’re already an experienced and comfortable programmer. The difficulty is further compounded by the fact that “you don’t know what you don’t know.” Even trying to figure out what to learn next is a puzzle in itself.

You’ll hit this wall no matter what “learn to code” program you follow, and the only way to get past it is to persevere. This means you keep trying new things, learning more information, and figuring out, piece by piece, how to build your project. You’re a lot more likely to find success in the end if you have a clear idea of why you’re learning to code in the first place.


If you keep putting bricks on top of each other, it might take a long time but eventually you’ll have a wall. This is where that faith I mentioned earlier comes in handy. If you believe that with time and patience you can figure the whole coding thing out, in time you almost certainly will.


Monday, 17 August 2015

Uberman or Polyphasic Sleeping

Nightly 8-Hour Sleep Isn't a Rule. It's a Myth.
Different sleep habits are just as valid, and maybe even preferable.
Ray Williams on Mar 03, 2014 in Wired for Success

We’ve been told by health experts, and it’s conventional wisdom, that we should sleep between seven and eight continuous hours a day as an adult. Yet, the assumption that an eight-hour block of sleep is the ideal or norm may be a myth.

Numerous studies have been published concerning the dangers of lack of sleep, to our brain and general health and longevity. In just one recent example, scientists have found that sleep allows our brains to clean themselves of toxins (link is external).

Yet, the insistence that "monophasic" sleep, with eight hours of continuous nightly rest, is the necessary way to refresh ourselves not only creates stress for people who are unable to achieve that goal, but ignores other common variations in sleep patterns, and historical precedent as well.

Everyone is different," says Matt Bianchi, director of the sleep division at Massachusetts General Hospital (link is external). "Some people drink caffeine and get a rush while others don’t. One person might be fitted for polyphasic sleep [sleeping in short multiple blocks throughout the day], but someone else gets sleepy and crashes their car.”

We're familiar with the stories of polyphasic sleepers such as Leonardo da Vinci, Thomas Edison, Nikola Tesla, Buckminster Fuller and Margaret Thatcher, who got along fine with as little as four hours sleep each night, but little attention is paid to such sleep cycles today.

Consider these underexplored variations on daily sleep:

* The Biphasic Schedule: Two three-to-four-hour sleeps with an hour of awake time in the middle.

* The Dymaxion Sleep Schedule: 30-minute “naps” every 6 hours.

* The Uberman Schedule: Six 30-minute naps per day.

* The Everyman Schedule: A daily three-hour sleep plus three 20-minute naps.

          Polyphasic Sleep - What is it?


          Uberman Sleep Schedule


All of these alternative sleep schedules are linked to evolution and history. A 2007 report from the Journal of Sleep (link is external), for example, found that the majority of animals on earth sleep on polyphasic schedules.

Most people in advanced countries today follow monophasic sleep cycles, or try to, but advocates of polyphasic sleep argue that their approaches trick the body into entering REM sleep more quickly, making the total length of sleep time less of an issue. Critics of monophasic sleep also argue that eight-hour sleep schedules just don’t account for individual differences. For example, it's believed that as much as three percent of the population can survive on only a few hours of sleep per night without ill effects.

History yields valuable insights regarding sleep. According to some recent research, until the age of electricity many people slept in two segments. They would wake up in the night for an hour or two, then return to sleep for another block of time. “The dominant pattern of sleep, arguably since time immemorial, was biphasic,” says Roger Ekirch, a sleep historian at Virginia Tech University and author of At Day’s Close: Night in Times Past (link is external). "Humans slept in two four-hour blocks, which were separated by a period of wakefulness in the middle of the night lasting an hour or more. During this time, some might stay in bed, pray, think about their dreams or talk with their spouses. Others might get up and do tasks or even visit neighbors before going back to sleep.”

References to “first sleep” or “deep sleep,” and “second sleep” or “morning sleep” abound in historical legal depositions, works of literature, and other pre-Industrial era archival documents. Gradually, during the 19th century, references to segmented sleep disappeared, Ekirch says, "and now people call it insomnia.”

Electric light at night now disrupts our circadian clock. The body reacts to bright light the same way it does to sunshine; too much can stop it from releasing melatonin, a hormone that regulates sleep.

In the 1990s, sleep scientist Thomas Wehr (link is external) discovered that most people will sleep biphasically when subjected to natural patterns of light and dark, supporting Ekirch’s findings.

Yet this research struggles to gain a wider audience. In an article in Psychiatric Times (link is external), Brown Medical School psychiatrist Walter Brown writes: “The general public seems to regard seven-to-eight hours of unbroken sleep as a birthright; anything less means that something is awry. Sleep specialists share this assumption.”

In other words, if you wake up in the middle of the night, don’t worry about it. “Waking up after a couple of hours may not be insomnia,” Wehr says. “It may be normal sleep.”

Ekirch adds, “If people don’t fight it, they’ll find themselves falling asleep again after one hour.”

Instead, many people who wake up in the middle of the night today automatically become anxious about not sleeping or reach for sleeping pills.

Our modern society, with its many stimuli, and an environment full of light, has partially created this hysteria about sleep, and combined with the myth that an 8-hour block of continuous sleep is essential, does all of us a disservice. Don’t forget about the well-documented benefits of incorporating naps into your day.


How Sleeping 6 Times a Day Helped the Founder of
“WordPress” Build a Billion-Dollar Company

Source:  What The Sleep Habits Of WordPress’s Founder
                 Can Tell Us About Success In Startups
             April 9, 2015 | Posted by Rachel Gillevet

I think we all know on one level or another that our sleep habits have a direct impact on how we perform in both our personal and professional lives. Too much sleep, and we’re dim, slow, and sluggish. Too little, and we’re ineffective and irritable.

There’s gotta be a middle ground somewhere – but many of us seem more or less incapable of finding it, instead slogging through our day on a mixture of willpower and entirely too much caffeine.

Not Matt Mullenweg. As the founder of WordPress – which powers more than 20% of the world’s websites – and Automattic – now valued at over a billion dollars, he’s among the tech industry’s most successful and influential entrepreneurs. And he also makes no secret about the fact that he naps. A lot. 

Six times a day, as a matter of fact.

During the early days of the company, Mullenweg operated on something known as the Uberman Sleep Schedule. While most people are monophasic sleepers – that is, they sleep once a day – Mullenweg’s a polyphasic sleeper. Rather than hitting the hay at night and waking up in the morning, he gets all his sleep through a strict schedule of naps.

Polyphasic sleeping is not a new concept,” notes Youth Health Mag. “People in Spain have been doing it religiously for many years. In fact, they have one of the longest lunches in the world, as workers usually spend a good amount of their time lounging, resting, and napping after their lunchtime meal.”

Mullenweg’s far from the only business leader to nap, either, nor is he the only one who follows the Uberman technique. Other noteworthy Ubermen include Leonardo Da Vinci and Thomas Jefferson, along with Tim Ferriss, best-selling author of The Four Hour Workweek. All pretty successful, no?

Now, it’s worth noting that Mullenweg no longer follows Uberman sleep. Since starting a new relationship, he’s back to regular sleep habits like all the rest of us. Even so, he points to his Uberman period as one of his all-time most successful.

The time when I was following the Uberman Technique was probably one of the most productive periods of my life,” explained Mullenweg in an interview with Ferriss. “I wrote WordPress in that time.”

The Power Of A Good Nap

Of course, the Uberman sleep schedule can be incredibly risky, even if it does increase your waking hours. Not only is it incredibly difficult to adapt to, prolonged lack of sleep can cause lasting physical and psychological damage. For those of us who dont quite feel like playing Russian Roulette with our sleep habits, there’s another solution – naps.

Hear me out.

See, there’s this stigma in the western world about napping. The general idea is that, if you regularly take naps, you’re lazy; you’re unproductive and more or less useless. Mullenweg and others like him are proof positive that this notion couldn’t be further from the truth.

Some people don’t need sleep, but I actually need a ton,” Mullenweg admitted in the interview. “I just sleep all the time, catching naps in the afternoon or a 20-minute snooze in the office…Sometimes I’ll go out at night, come home from the bar at 2 or 3am, and then go back to work.”

And again, Mullenweg is hardly the only entrepreneur with polyphasic sleep habits.

I do a lot of very mediocre stuff, but once in a while I come up with a really good idea,” said Hubspot CEO Brian Halligan to Business Insider. “Maybe I’ll come up with two in a month. Those two inevitably happen when I’m falling into a nap, coming out of a nap, or waking up slowly on a Saturday morning.”

According to research from The Journal of Sleep, even something as simple as a ten minute power nap in the afternoon can work wonders for both focus and productivity.

Closing Thoughts

Success in the startup world demands both great efficiency and boundless energy. Those are hard to come by when you’re dragging yourself through your day in a sleep-deprived haze. Napping could be the perfect solution – it could be just what you need to succeed.

Everyone’s sleep needs are different, of course. What worked for Mullenweg might not necessarily work for you (and vice versa). The trick is finding something that fits you specifically, and sticking to it.

Become Uberman & Sleep like Da Vinci:
The Polyphasic Sleep Cheat Sheet

A College Student & Polyphasic Sleep:
The Who, What, Where, Why, and How
http://markocalvocruz.com/2015/07/polyphasic/